Bringing yourself to work

comments 5
Management 101

Wow, this is so much more tiring than programming…

Those who manage others: have you ever had one of those days where you feel like work has completely sapped you of all of your emotional energy? Don’t worry, it’s not just you.

Being a manager exposes you to a rich spectrum of challenges at work. Of course, you still have the technical matters that come along with working at a technology company, and those are difficult enough at the best of times. Yet now you have to care personally about the well-being of those in your team. When times are good and your team is performing well and enjoying their work, it’s hard to imagine your role being more fulfilling. When times are bad, however, well… they’re really bad.

So let’s paint a picture of the bad times. In addition to being accountable for the delivery of a large, complex project that is overrunning, you know that Bob is really unhappy because he didn’t get a good pay rise in his end of year review. However, this was totally out of your hands this time around; the budget is very tight. You’re uncertain as to whether he wants to quit and what that means for you finding a replacement. On top of that, Susan has disclosed that she’s been having a terrible time at home because her partner is very ill. Also, Jack isn’t performing well and his stubbornness means he’s having trouble admitting it to himself, which is a barrier to his eventual improvement. To put the icing on the proverbial cake, the company laid off 10% of staff two months ago because of fierce competition in the marketplace resulting in many lost deals that looked totally safe. Everyone, therefore, is understandably nervous about their roles and the threat of further layoffs. As well as carrying this you’ve got your own stuff to deal with: pressure from above, below, and outside of work, your family at home.

How much should you care about everyone’s personal issues when deep down you’re really struggling to stay positive in your own mind?

It’s your job to care

You should care. Because that’s your job. Plain and simple. It’s very hard and it’s very emotional, but it’s a core principle of being a good manager. There is no other way to look at this particular situation. For your staff, you are their rock, mentor, and confidante. Technical issues can be solved by studying literature, algorithms, and documentation, but personal issues can only be solved by being present and being human.

If you are reading this because you are thinking about becoming a manager, then this is often the part that you aren’t told about explicitly. You may read a job description and see that you will be responsible for delivering a key part of the product with your team; making your staff perform at the best of their abilities; hiring the right people, and so on: all of these activities may make you imagine an army captain at the crest of a hill clutching a flag. However, in reality, it’s not at all about machismo and whip-cracking. Fostering an environment in which people can thrive and be happy means understanding their personalities, what drives them, and being there for them through good times and bad. This may sound like it has parallels to the job of a counselor, and I would argue that there are aspects of that comparison that are true; except you also need to get your staff to ship as well as making sure that they are happy!

Bringing your whole self to work

The phrase “bringing your whole self to work” has become fairly prevalent, and for good reason: it encompasses what you have to do in order to build a trusting relationship with direct reports, which in turn means that they feel comfortable and supported, which in turn means that you can have open, honest and challenging conversations, which in turn drives the best performance.

But what does it mean?

My own interpretation is that it highlights the parts of one’s personality that can be easy to leave at home: true emotions and weaknesses. I’ve experienced this equally in both men and women.

One may leave their emotional side at home because of a preconception that it could be deemed unprofessional to let particular sides of them show in the office. Common examples are negative emotions such as sadness, anger, and frustration. However positive emotions sometimes suffer the same purposeful muting, such as overt happiness, joy, and silliness. It could be believed that the “professional” workplace is not where these should be exposed: after all, we’re trying to be professionals, aren’t we? Yet, all of these emotions are part of us as humans and should not be suppressed. Instead, as managers, we should be understanding the character of our staff deeply enough to create the environment in which they can truly be themselves without any part of their personality being absent. This is an environment in which they can thrive. Think about ways to have fun, to celebrate success, to get angry and frustrated, to be OK with being sad and letting it show.

Weaknesses are also often left at home. Weaknesses are human. Nobody is perfect, and nobody is meant to be perfect. An environment that encourages people to hide weaknesses is an environment that stifles self-improvement. It takes great confidence to admit to weaknesses: why would anyone want to expose that they are not as good at something as others, especially if they are on a high-performing team? Yet, by cultivating an environment in which your staff can admit their weaknesses to you, and by openly sharing your own weaknesses with them, you can in turn influence a culture of mutual mentorship and teaching. An admission of a weakness is an opportunity for learning and improvement, and it is enabled through building trust.

Trust enables performance

Despite the emotional toll, especially for the new manager, that caring deeply and personally can take, it is the foundation for enabling high performance. Staff that have a trusting environment and close relationships with their manager and colleagues can be themselves and do their best work.

This trusting relationship allows for challenging and frank conversations. Talking about bad performance is not as difficult if there is trust and respect between the two parties. Without trust, bad performance may be the taboo subject that goes unspoken for too long. With trust, it’s (almost) as easy to discuss as anything else, because the feedback comes from a caring place, rather than a hostile one.

Practice talking about weaknesses

An exercise that you can try with your staff in their 1 to 1s is to both discuss your weaknesses, but you go first. Pick a selection of your own weaknesses that you can put on the table and let them know how you feel about them, as long as they are able to reveal at least one of theirs.

Here’s three of mine:

  • Given that I am now spending almost all of my time managing a division, I do worry that my technical skills are weakening. For example, the toolkits to do machine learning have dramatically changed since I last did any hands-on work. I continually worry that my technical skills are becoming irrelevant, and if I turn out to be a bad leader or I have a change of heart about my career, what is my fallback plan?
  • I am often too fast at wanting to solve problems myself rather than waiting for consensus. I know that this can be seen as a strength, but I can step on the toes of others and make them feel bad.
  • My obsession with speed means I can blaze a trail and forget about key details. This can be seen with stupid bugs in software I’ve written (fortunately others here are rewriting all of my code now…), or in the email thanking a team that just went out where I missed someone’s name off. Again. It can be quite embarrassing.

Support groups

And lastly: an open question for the readership. Being a manager, especially the higher up the org chart that you go, can be a lonely and emotionally difficult position. I often feel like I lack a support group in the same way that I did when I was an individual contributor on a team, or even when I ran one team, as there were a number of other leads I considered my peers. I think that we all need a place to get support, to vent, and to let go of some of the weight that we carry. Where do you go?

Giving feedback

Leave a comment
Management 101

Easy, right?

The concept of giving feedback is simple to grasp: you want to let people know when they are doing a stellar job so that they can receive praise, and conversely, you want to let people know when they are not performing to your standards so that you can begin to help them improve.

The truth is that giving feedback well is very difficult to do. It’s easy to see why giving negative feedback is tough: it might not land well, it might upset the other party; it essentially creates conflict. Yet, giving positive feedback can also be challenging. It’s awkward telling people they’re amazing!

Mastering the art of giving feedback has a number of benefits. Your employees know where they stand, either as star performers or those that need to do better. Practiced regularly, it also strengthens the emotional bond between you and your staff because giving honest feedback requires honesty and trust.

What happens when you don’t give good feedback

Let’s start with an example. Susan is leading a team of engineers, and something seems to be up with one of her staff, Ann. It seems that Ann just doesn’t seem to be giving it her all in recent weeks. She’s been turning up slightly late every day, and a lot of the features that she’s worked on have had some gnarly bugs found in QA. Something’s not quite right.

In their next 1 to 1, Susan asks whether she’s OK as a way of trying to get her to open up about whatever is bothering her. “I’m doing fine” is Ann’s reply. The issue gets skirted this time. Fast forward to next week. Susan prods at the situation a little more by asking how her feature is going, as a way of getting her to open up about the recent issues that were found in QA. “It’s just been complicated to develop” is Ann’s reply.

Weeks go by, and the situation is getting worse. Other members of the team have approached Susan because they are finding it increasingly frustrating to rely on Ann to deliver to the expected standard, and progress in the team is slowing down as they move closer to their launch date.

In the next 1 to 1, Susan decides to ask whether Ann needs any additional support as she seems a bit under the weather. She uses this as a way to slowly steer towards the problem. “I’m OK, but I find working with the API difficult sometimes”. Susan decides to pair Ann up with a mentor within the team so that she can pair program on the parts of the work that build on the API.

One week on, and Ann’s mentor, Robert, sends Susan a message. “I’m finding it really frustrating trying to pair program with Ann. She seems really distracted and doesn’t seem to want to learn.” Now you have your team looking for answers.

As the end of the quarter approaches, Susan prepares Ann’s performance review. It isn’t great. She writes up all of the aspects of her role that haven’t been performed to the expected level, incorporating the feedback from the team. She sends over the performance review ahead of the meeting. Ann turns up to the meeting looking distraught. Susan asks if she has read the feedback. Ann gets extremely angry. “If I wasn’t performing well enough, why didn’t you tell me?”

People actually like feedback. Give it!

Good or bad, people want to hear how they’re doing. Get into the habit of giving good or bad feedback whenever you can. Your 1 to 1s are an obvious place to do this, but keeping it front of mind when having meetings or informal interactions can uncover many more places to fit feedback in. Positive feedback can be given pretty much anywhere and to anyone: an informal chat around the coffee machine can become an opportunity to congratulate a colleague on their recent feature launch and tell them how much you like it. However, frank and constructive criticism is best saved, initially, for those that you have a stronger and more open relationship with, such as your direct reports, peers and manager. (Yes, your manager too!)

Your best performers will want consistent feedback that they are doing well and that you appreciate the effort that they are putting in. Similar to how superstars in the classroom can become frustrated at the disruptive children that are getting all of the teacher’s negative attention, you will want to make sure that you are praising and pushing your stars to perform at the best of their ability. This will not only mean that they will be happier and feel appreciated, but it will keep them contributing at a higher level.

For staff that require improvement, they absolutely need to know. In the previous example, Susan was not tackling the problem with Ann directly. Instead, she was trying to gently approach the issue from different angles, but with little success; at review time, Ann was surprised that she had negative feedback. Instead, Susan should have been direct as early as possible. This can be challenging but becomes easier with experience.

Try to be direct, compassionate and open to solutions. Focus on the future improvement rather than dwelling for too long on past events.

  1. Be direct: “Ann, I’d like to talk to you about your performance. I have noticed that recently it is not up to standard and one of your colleagues has also approached me about it.”
  2. Be compassionate: “I really want you to be awesome in this role so that you are able to continue to level up in your career. You’re a very smart person, and I worry a lot if you’re not able to perform well.”
  3. Be direct again: “If you’re unable to perform in your current role then we will have to look more formally at the options available for you. In the worst-case, this could be a conversation about whether this company is the right place for you to be.”
  4. Be open: “How can we identify and work on what you need to improve?”

Radical candor

Kim Scott’s excellent book Radical Candor distills the traits of giving good feedback into two simple categories: “Care Personally” and “Challenge Directly“. When these two traits are combined in the relationship between a manager and their direct reports, the right atmosphere is in place to criticize, praise and push people to perform at a high level.

Being able to challenge directly requires an extremely high level of trust and emotional rapport between two people. Scott argues that the core of this trust is simply giving a damn, personally. Two people that care personally about each other can challenge each other directly with positive consequences. Think of a sports coach. This also works in both directions, since the direct report should have a level of trust that allows them to care and challenge upwards, as well.

The book is well worth reading. Kim is a smart author and has some great ideas.

Getting practice: an exercise

Here’s an exercise that you can try with your peer group. Depending on your organization, this will either be extremely positive or extremely awkward (shifting to positive, though, as people get more comfortable). One session I took part in began with everyone feeling very nervous, but by the end of it, we all felt much closer, and there were a lot of laughs too.

Book a meeting and invite your peer group along. Before the meeting, ask for each attendee to prepare one piece of praise and one area to improve for everyone attending. Then, in the meeting, pair everyone off and then each person can deliver these pieces of feedback. Swap the partners around every couple of minutes until all feedback has been delivered.

Gather back together at the end. What did everyone find easy? What did they find difficult? How did they react to receiving the positive and negative feedback? Do they feel that their relationship has changed between everyone within the room?